Resources / Study / Innovation for Court ADR

Just Court ADR

The blog of Resolution Systems Institute

Archive for the ‘COVID-19’ Category

COVID’s ERA and Beyond: How Rental Assistance Affects Eviction Mediation

Stephen Sullivan, June 18th, 2026

Recently, we looked back at the past five years of RSI’s Kane County Eviction Mediation Program. When we launched the program during the COVID-19 pandemic, an eviction moratorium was in place and the prospect of mass evictions loomed. Families feared losing their homes, landlords contended with uncertainty over managing property costs, and courts were concerned about their capacity to handle the anticipated volume of eviction cases.

Stock Photo by Nicola Barts via Pexels

The program’s primary goal has been to provide mediation as an opportunity for tenants and landlords to avoid eviction and pursue alternative solutions. One of the key ways we support this work is to connect parties to resources that may help them navigate their situation, including legal aid and information, financial counseling and, crucially, rental assistance. During the pandemic, the Emergency Rental Assistance (ERA) program helped renters who fell behind on payments. In the years since, our staff has continued to reach out to state and local programs to determine what assistance is available and to share this information with parties.

In this article, I discuss the program’s role in sharing resources with parties and how the availability of rental assistance supports positive mediation outcomes. I also discuss recently published research by Eviction Lab analyzing the ERA’s impact across the country.

Sharing Resources with Parties

Most eviction cases that enter our program involve nonpayment of past due rent due to financial hardship. Rental assistance programs provide emergency relief in such cases; funds can cover back rent or a set amount of future rent for eligible applicants. Rental assistance benefits both tenants and landlords. It ensures landlords get the rent they are owed and helps tenants maintain their housing and avoid having an eviction on their record.

However, tenants and landlords often do not know how to access these funds or how to determine their eligibility. Sometimes these programs are also paused as states or localities determine their budgets. These factors may prevent interested parties from knowing about or accessing critical resources to ease their situation. 

This is where the Eviction Mediation Program steps in. As Program Manager Christina Wright shared, “Our program has the opportunity to keep the court and parties informed of these programs, increasing the likelihood of use with or without mediation. Rent assistance is a lifeline for both landlords and tenants and often plays a role in resolving said cases.” Our program staff regularly refers tenants and landlords to rental assistance programs, particularly the Illinois Court-Based Rental Assistance Program (CBRAP), which provides up to $10,000 to cover past due rent and/or funds to cover two months of future rent.

Rental assistance is especially time sensitive because application approval and disbursement of funds cannot happen immediately. At this early stage of the case, self-represented tenants and landlords are often overwhelmed by the amount of information they receive and feel unsure about what they need to do. This is where the mediation program’s intervention can make a meaningful difference. Ensuring parties can effectively and capably access the resources they need remains a core part of the work we do.

Rental Assistance Benefits to Mediation

RSI connects tenants and landlords to resources at various points of the mediation process. Beyond the direct benefits they provide, these resources also help parties better prepare to participate in mediation. As a result, parties are able to develop agreement terms that are practicable.

Without rental assistance resources, the scope of possible solutions narrows. Financial issues may remain unresolved if tenants feel unsure about what they can pay or are pressured to agree to payment plans that they later cannot meet. “We see fewer opportunities for parties to settle with a ‘pay and stay’ agreement,” shares Wright. RSI’s evaluation of New Hampshire’s Eviction Diversion Program found a similar trend. When the state’s rental assistance funding ended, overall agreement rates held, but the proportion of agreements to stay dropped (from 62% before rental assistance ended to 31% afterward).

Research on other eviction mediation programs finds that the availability of rental relief contributes to positive mediation outcomes. For example, an evaluation of Hawai’i’s Act 57 mediation program, established to anticipate the end of the state’s eviction moratorium in August 2021, found that 66% of agreements that involved the repayment of back rent noted the use of rental assistance[1]. Mediators and attorneys interviewed for the study agreed that rent relief helped parties to resolve their disputes[2].

A similar evaluation of an Eviction Diversion Program in Philadelphia found that cases were less likely to result in a subsequent eviction filing if parties received rental assistance (7.4% filing rate) than if they did not (42.2% filing rate). The researchers also note that provision of rental assistance made a meaningful impact in lowering court filing rates whether or not parties mediated or reached an agreement. The lowest rates were among those who received assistance, mediated and reached an agreement (4.2%) and those who received assistance, did not mediate but reached an agreement (1.8%).

When RSI launched our eviction mediation program, ERA was the largest source of rental assistance funds. Eviction Lab recently conducted a study on whether ERA was successful at reaching those who needed assistance most and what patterns emerged in how states distributed funding. Overall, their data suggests that ERA spending was significantly higher in high-risk neighborhoods —where eviction cases were most concentrated before the pandemic. They found that ERA also reached the demographics most at risk for eviction, including renters in majority-Black and majority-Hispanic neighborhoods. Additionally, households with children and those with higher unemployment rates received higher rates of funding than those without children or with lower unemployment rates. States varied in how they distributed funds, but Eviction Lab’s data suggests that these variations had little effect on national patterns: “the distribution of aid matched the geography of housing insecurity.”

Conclusion

These findings point to the benefit of having external support programs such as rental assistance to promote mediation program objectives and help tenants and landlords avoid eviction. Reaching parties who may not know what resources are available or how to access them remains a challenge. This is where effective communications — such as those we identified in our OPEN Project — can make a meaningful difference. The RSI research team is currently working with the eviction mediation program team to update our program materials to ensure parties can effectively learn about the program and access the resources they need. Stay tuned for updates on this project.

[1] The researchers note that it is unclear whether the remaining 33% of cases did not involve rental assistance or if the mediator did not make reference to it in the settlement agreements.

[2] The researchers note that while rent relief availability is an important factor to ensuring housing stability, it alone does not ensure such an outcome. They note that combining rent relief with a robust pre-litigation mediation process strengthens mediation outcomes.

Grant-Funded Research Adds to Evidence on How to Make Eviction Mediation Effective

Eric Slepak Cherney, November 21st, 2022

Last month, RSI reached the end of an 18-month grant from the American Arbitration Association-International Centre for Dispute Resolution (AAA-ICDR) Foundation. A primary goal of the grant was to provide guidance to courts nationwide about addressing the eviction crisis arising from the COVID-19 pandemic. As that project has come to a close, we at RSI would like to look back at what we accomplished, and learned, from the experience.

Our Eviction Mediation Program and Special Topic

The first focus of the grant was to help us establish a local court mediation program, serving Kane County, Illinois. While it may seem counterintuitive that a project with a focus on national guidance invest in a local program, our approach at RSI is to utilize our mediation programs as “laboratories” for the research and evaluation that is core to our mission. We have a long history of designing and administering programs, and as part of that work, we implement established best practices, set up robust monitoring and evaluation systems, and carefully and thoughtfully test out different approaches to help us achieve the goals we set for our programs. The Kane County Eviction Mediation program is no exception (See related article above), and it served as the basis for many exciting accomplishments of the project, detailed further below.

Our next big milestone was developing the Eviction Mediation Special Topic. Special Topics are collections of resources RSI curates around court alternative dispute resolution (ADR) as it relates to different subject matter (e.g., child protection mediation and restorative justice) or interested parties (e.g., judges and lawyers). For eviction, we sought to develop a Special Topic collection that was both topical to the present crisis and also highlighted the best research, guidance and tools for those invested in the development and administration of effective eviction diversion programs.

Blogs and Evaluation Projects

Throughout the 18 months of the grant, the RSI team was regularly blogging about our experiences developing and administering our programs, and what we were learning from others across the country. A few highlights from our blogging include glimpses into innovative program models in Hawaii and Philadelphia, and program design considerations such as working with rental assistance programs and cultivating buy-in from landlords. Additionally, a pair of Q&As with our Programs Manager Chris Riehlmann and our Kane County Program Coordinator Christina Wright provide a great look into what it really takes to make these program work day in and day out.

Finally, and most significantly, the grant supported several evaluative projects we embarked on over this past year and a half. We analyzed the results of our post-mediation surveys to assess whether our programs were providing procedural justice to participants. After reflecting on the steps we’d taken to develop programs and conducting interviews with key program personnel and partners, RSI published program implementation guides to give others nationwide a manual of sorts for building and tweaking their own programs. The project culminated in an evaluation of the Kane County program’s first 13 months (summarized in the article above by RSI Director of Research Jennifer Shack), assessing program use, services provided, mediation outcomes and participant experience.

A Few Key Findings

The amount of information we have learned and done our best to share during the course of this project has been staggering. While any summation is sure to be incomplete, we’d like to leave you with a few key findings from the project:

  1. Integrated and holistic service delivery approaches truly made for better outcomes. Programs that took a comprehensive and progressive approach to combatting eviction saw more agreements and fewer evictions. Similarly, programs that brought more partners to the table, including social service agencies, advocacy groups, state and municipal representatives, and others, saw greater success. While eviction cases are ultimately resolved by courts, the underlying issues are economic and social in nature, and collaboration with entities that address those causes is highly valuable.
     
  2. Good eviction mediations take time. Prior to the pandemic, mediation in housing disputes, in many jurisdictions, was typically an event that took place on the day of the first court appearance and lasted no more than half an hour. Unsurprisingly, agreement rates in this context were generally low. A number of programs we worked with noted that utilizing a model where mediation was done outside of court (and the time constraints that usually entails) resulted in greater agreement. Allotting more time for the session gave greater opportunity to work through impasse, and scheduling mediation for an advance date gave parties the time to better prepare for mediation, including taking stock of finances, asking for support, applying for rental assistance, and consulting attorneys.
     
  3. Remote mediation, which is the norm for RSI’s programs and many others still, continues to offer mixed blessings for participants. The flexibility afforded parties by doing remote mediation meant many more parties could participate without taking a day off work, critical for parties trying desperately to pay back past due rent. On the other hand, our data noted that about 1 in 6 needed to borrow a device or leave home to participate virtually, and 1 in 5 experienced some sort of technical difficulty. Making sure that in-person accommodations could be offered to those who could not or would prefer not to participate virtually ought to be a priority to ensure access, and RSI did so with our Kane County program.

We are tremendously grateful to the AAA-ICDR Foundation for its support of this project.

Off the Mainland, Out of the Box: Hawaii’s Innovative Eviction Mediation Program

Eric Slepak Cherney, September 20th, 2022

This article is part of a series of perspectives on eviction mediation program development that is being supported by the American Arbitration Association-International Centre for Dispute Resolution Foundation. The AAA-ICDR’s grant is enabling RSI to expand our outreach to court ADR colleagues working in the fast-evolving eviction field, and we are tremendously grateful to the Foundation for their support.

Earlier this summer, I had the opportunity to learn about a successful and innovative eviction mediation program on the island of Oahu in Hawaii. Mediation Center of the Pacific (MCP) Executive Director Tracey Wiltgen generously shared some of her time with me to explain how the program works.

Photo by Jess Loiterton via Pexels

Prior to the pandemic, MCP conducted landlord-tenant mediations on-site in Oahu’s courtrooms. Not atypical of many in-court eviction mediation programs pre-pandemic, parties and mediators were often limited to 20 minutes to mediate their cases. MCP was able to help parties reach agreement in about half of cases, and in about one-fifth of those agreements, the tenant would be able to stay in their home. All things considered, those statistics were pretty impressive.

But in the wake of Hawaii’s eviction moratorium being lifted in August 2021, MCP’s eviction mediation program accomplished some truly remarkable things. In less than a year, it mediated over 1,300 cases and reached agreement in 87% of those. Underlying those successes was a strong foundation upon which MCP built its program.

Making the Most of the Moratorium

The program was developed with the input of many interested parties taken into consideration. Housing advocates and other nonprofit organizations, landlord representatives, Realtors and property managers, legislators and academics all had seats at the table when designing this program. The program was codified into legislation as Act 57, which set forth the procedure and requirements for participation.

Hawaii’s moratorium was lifted in an unconventional tiered system, whereby landlords were allowed to file their cases on a schedule according to how many months of back rent was owed. While landlords were in this holding pattern, they were required to file a notice with MCP of their intent to file their case in court, so that MCP could reach out to tenants and inform them about the process. If the tenant wanted mediation, the landlord would be required to participate. The ability to engage in mediation before the court case was formally filed gave parties more time to explore options, and it helped reduce strain on the court.

Funding Extends Reach

With funding from Act 57, MCP was able to shift from using volunteer mediators to paid ones. The organization recruited 30 mediators from 15 states to mediate these cases remotely. Treating mediators as independent contractors, MCP required that mediators have proficiency in Zoom and generally high levels of digital literacy. This meant that MCP did not have to dedicate staff resources to providing technical support during mediations, or accommodate time-intensive scheduling requests (scheduling was mostly automated through the YouCanBookMe tool). Instead, their case managers were freed up to focus on reaching out to as many parties as they could.

MCP also astutely used the funding from Act 57 to invest in its own internal processes. This included setting up an online portal enabling the landlords to provide the required notice to MCP. The form the landlords filled out fed directly into MCP’s case management system, saving staff lots of time and effort.

Having shifted away from the on-site mediation model, parties were now free to have longer sessions, typically 90 minutes. This no doubt played a role in increasing the agreement rate, allowing parties the space to work through impasses that could not be ironed out in a rapid-fire, 20-minute session.

The joint efforts among mediation programs, alongside rental assistance and legal aid efforts, are central to many eviction diversion initiatives, and the MCP program was no exception. MCP staff and mediators shared a Microsoft Teams workspace with the local rental assistance partner, which enabled them to get real-time updates on the status of an application during a mediation. Legal aid and other service providers worked closely with the mediation program, and referrals between one another were standard procedure.

Unfortunately, Act 57 was a temporary initiative and was not renewed when it expired in August 2022. MCP nonetheless is continuing to offer mediation on a voluntary, prefiling basis to interested parties. MCP’s model provides excellent guidance to courts looking to develop and improve upon their eviction mediation efforts. While moratoria in most places have been lifted, the need for comprehensive eviction solutions has failed to abate as recession, inflation and the ongoing impacts of COVID-19 continue to exacerbate housing issues.

Announcing RSI’s National Eviction ADR Project

Eric Slepak Cherney, May 27th, 2021

This article is part of a series of perspectives on eviction mediation program development that is being supported by the American Arbitration Association-International Centre of Dispute Resolution Foundation. The AAA-ICDR’s grant is enabling RSI to expand our outreach to other court ADR colleagues working in the fast-evolving eviction field, and we are tremendously grateful to the Foundation for their support.

Last year, the COVID-19 pandemic profoundly impacted American society in ways that are still playing out. The fallout from a public health standpoint was tremendous and its consequences rippled into almost every aspect of society. Chief among the impacts was significant economic contraction, as  a staggering number of individuals suffered reduced or lost income as a consequence of layoffs, reduced hours, contracting the virus, or caring for loved ones who had.

Unable to afford their monthly rent, tens of millions of Americans have found themselves at risk of eviction. The United States Department of Housing and Urban Development and Centers for Disease Control instituted moratoriums on eviction, though each had some gaps. (The CDC moratorium has been vacated by a federal ruling. As of the writing of this blog post, that decision is being appealed and the moratorium remains in place for now).

Along with these federal protections, many states and localities enacted their own, generally more comprehensive, moratoriums. Approximately one-third of states still have an eviction moratorium on the books. However, for other jurisdictions, eviction proceedings not precluded by federal moratorium have resumed, and courts in jurisdictions where there are state or local moratoriums are expecting a significant surge of cases when those are lifted.

To address this uptick in cases, many courts are turning to mediation and other forms of alternative dispute resolution. Subscribers to our monthly newsletter, The Court ADR Connection, are no doubt aware of various programs that have arisen in recent months. We have been diligently trying to capture and report on these efforts in an attempt to provide our core audience of court ADR professionals with information about how others are navigating this unprecedented situation.

To that end, we are excited to announce our new eviction ADR resource sharing project. Thanks to the generous funding of the American Arbitration Association-International Centre for Dispute Resolution Foundation, RSI will be able to share resources, guidance and our expertise with a national audience. In the coming weeks and months, we will be rolling out a series of resources we hope will help inform and mobilize the field to more effectively serve disputants and hopefully assist landlords and tenants in avoiding eviction.

These resources include our Eviction Mediation Special Topic, which will share program development insights; house sample documents like court rules, surveys and mediation notices; and even include a living database in which we have been collecting data on known eviction ADR programs nationwide. We also will be publishing a monthly blog series on our experiences developing a new mediation program based in Kane County, Illinois and collaborating with others across the country on eviction ADR. Finally, we will also conduct a comprehensive evaluation of the Kane County program’s first year, and publish it on our site, alongside smaller reports about the program’s implementation and quarterly progress, to contribute to the existing body of knowledge regarding ADR’s efficacy in resolving these disputes.

The COVID-19 crisis was unexpected, but now many courts are expecting or already experiencing eviction crises. To help court ADR programs meet these challenges, RSI is providing a robust mix of expertise, data, analysis and research, as well as sample forms, rules, videos and websites.We are grateful to the AAA-ICDR Foundation for enabling us to do this work. 

To stay up to date with all these efforts, and the other work RSI is doing, please make sure you are subscribed to our newsletter. We also welcome our court ADR colleagues to reach out to us with information about your eviction ADR programs.

Verified by ExactMetrics