Resources / Study / Innovation for Court ADR

Just Court ADR

The blog of Resolution Systems Institute

Archive for the ‘Eviction Mediation’ Category

Eviction Mediation Program Spotlight: Philadelphia

Eric Slepak Cherney, January 31st, 2022

This article is part of a series of perspectives on eviction mediation program development that is being supported by the American Arbitration Association-International Centre for Dispute Resolution Foundation. The AAA-ICDR’s grant is enabling RSI to expand our outreach to court ADR colleagues working in the fast-evolving eviction field, and we are tremendously grateful to the Foundation for their support.

Launched in August 2020, the Philadelphia Eviction Diversion Program stands out as an exemplary effort in this field.

In a city known for its famous underdog, Philadelphia’s eviction diversion program is trying to give folks a fighting chance. Image Credit: Todd van Hoosear via Flickr.


About the Program

City council legislation requires landlords to inform tenants of their rights and request mediation prior to filing an eviction claim in the Municipal Court of Philadelphia. Additionally, prior to the city’s rental assistance program running out of funds, landlords were also required to apply to that program in an effort to mitigate their claims.

Mediations are administered by a community mediation partner, CORA Good Shepherd Mediation. The mediator roster consists of volunteer neutrals, including a number of mediators from JAMS.

Data from January 2021 indicated that the parties were able to reach an agreement that kept the tenant in the unit in about 70% of mediations. An additional 22% were able to agree on a different outcome, such as moving out, that avoided the tenant receiving an eviction on their record.

Last month, the city council passed legislation to extend the operation of the program through 2022. Additionally, the legislation provided for updating the required notice of diversion rights which tenants must receive, which now will include an updated ledger so the tenant knows the exact amount the landlord is seeking and how that total is derived. The program is also utilizing a web portal to expedite the disputes and give parties another mechanism to interact directly.

Things We Really Like About This Model

  • Rental assistance is the real lynchpin that makes eviction diversion possible. However, many jurisdictions we have heard from have faced challenges in making sure that parties know how to access that fund. By integrating it directly into the eviction dispute resolution process, the Philadelphia program greatly reduced the chance of parties missing that opportunity.
  • The ability/infrastructure to capture parties pre-filing lessens strain on the court system. Additionally, unless the jurisdiction has mechanisms to seal eviction filings in place, the filing itself could be tremendously detrimental to the tenant’s future housing prospects.
  • Requiring ledgers can bring much needed clarity to a dispute. Determining the exact amount owed and how that figure is calculated is a frequent focus in mediation, and making that document a necessity can provide parties a helpful reference to inform the conversation.
  • The new web portal is another nice engagement point that hopefully diverts further cases from eviction. Every dispute is unique, and not all of them will need full-blown mediation to help serve the parties. Giving parties some self-help tools to communicate, exchange information, and negotiate may be sufficient for some disputes.

Sources:

https://www.phila.gov/2020-08-31-philadelphia-launches-eviction-diversion-program/

https://evictioninnovation.org/2020/10/16/philadelphias-eviction-diversion-through-mediation-program/

https://www.axios.com/local/philadelphia/2022/01/11/philadelphia-eviction-diversion-program-changes

https://www.jamsadr.com/news/2021/hon-annette-m-rizzo-ret-and-the-philadelphia-eviction-diversion-program-featured-in-urban-institutes-report

https://www.urban.org/research/publication/eviction-prevention-and-diversion-programs-early-lessons-pandemic

Eviction Mediation Q&A w/ Christina Wright

Just Court ADR, December 30th, 2021

This article is part of a series of perspectives on eviction mediation program development that is being supported by the American Arbitration Association-International Centre for Dispute Resolution Foundation. The AAA-ICDR’s grant is enabling RSI to expand our outreach to court ADR colleagues working in the fast-evolving eviction field, and we are tremendously grateful to the Foundation for their support.

RSI began operating our first eviction mediation program in spring of 2021, based in Kane County, Illinois. Here, Program Coordinator Christina Wright answers questions posed by Executive Director Susan Yates about the program.

Susan Yates: Please tell us a little about who this program serves.

Christina Wright: We primarily serve very low-income renters, including section 8 and those with housing vouchers. Many are living on zero wages or social security. Family sizes vary from 1 to 5, and I rarely see families larger than 5. The families are both in large cities, like Elgin and Aurora, and in rural areas like Elburn. Kane County is a large jurisdiction that spans urban and rural populations. Those receiving services from our program are primarily white, Latino and black, and comprise all genders. English and Spanish are the primary languages spoken. Many participants have already utilized other community/government programs. Some receive these benefits, while others have been repeatedly denied, and have run out of good options.

RSI Kane County Eviction Mediation Program Coordinator Christina Wright
RSI Kane County Eviction Mediation Program Coordinator Christina Wright

SY: How does this program operate?

CW: The process begins when an eviction case is filed with the court. Once the case begins, parties are eligible to participate in the mediation program. Either the landlord or the tenant can initiate the process by contacting the program. Most first contacts are made during a court appearance. However, landlords are required to deliver a notice of the program to tenants during service, so some enrollments begin when a party reaches out prior to the first court appearance.

By initiating contact with the program, participants compel the other party to participate. The program coordinator is tasked with connecting the parties to coordinate a virtual mediation date. All mediations are currently being conducted via Zoom. Once a date is settled, the coordinator schedules a trained mediator to serve for that case. Mediators work in 4 hour shifts and may mediate 1-4 cases during that time. On average, mediations take about 50 minutes.

Mediations are confidential, so while the ultimate outcome is reported to the court, the details of the process remain private. There are many different potential outcomes to an eviction mediation, but the most common agreements involve move out dates and/or payment plans. Once an agreement is made, the mediator completes a court order that is submitted to and signed by the judge. This ends the mediation process and, typically, the court case. By coming to a mutual agreement in mediation, future court dates and eviction orders are prevented.

SY: Eviction mediation programs are often described as eviction diversion programs. What are the aspects of your programs, other than mediation?

CW: We work with the community to provide solutions to the more common problems we see related to eviction, such as financial need. Our partners help participants apply for financial relief programs that help with things such as rent and utilities in hopes of preventing evictions based on past due rent. Participants can consult with attorneys to meet their legal needs and housing counselors to help them find affordable housing.

SY: Tell us a little more about your partners in these programs. What do they do? How do parties get in touch with them?

CW: We have partnered with several other community organizations in an attempt to provide as many services as possible to those in need. Prairie State Legal Service offers free legal representation to those who qualify. The Aurora Financial Empowerment Center helps clients with a variety of consumer needs, as well as assisting applicants with financial aid applications. Consumer Credit Counseling Services and The Neighbor Project provide housing counseling services. We provide referrals to these organizations that let parties contact them directly.

SY: Who are your mediators? What kind of training do they have? What are their professional and/or personal backgrounds?

CW: Our mediators come from a diverse set of backgrounds. Many are attorneys and arbitrators, while others are counselors, teachers, executives and retired from many other careers. All of the mediators have completed a 30-hour (or longer) mediation certification, many through our partners at the Center for Conflict Resolution. They also have all been trained on the unique needs of eviction mediation. Some have also chosen to receive additional training in a variety of styles of conflict resolution. Our mediators reflect many different races and genders, speak multiple languages, and because of the virtual nature of the mediations, reside across the country (and some even internationally).

Eviction Mediation Updates, December 2021

Eric Slepak Cherney, December 17th, 2021

This article is part of a series of perspectives on eviction mediation program development that is being supported by the American Arbitration Association-International Centre of Dispute Resolution Foundation. The AAA-ICDR’s grant is enabling RSI to expand our outreach to other court ADR colleagues working in the fast-evolving eviction field, and we are tremendously grateful to the Foundation for their support.

As the state of eviction mediation continues to evolve, we wanted to share some notable developments from across the country.

State of Moratoria

According to Nolo, the vast majority of jurisdictions have lifted moratoria on eviction filings. With the overturning of the Centers for Disease Control’s moratorium at the federal level earlier this summer, that means in most places in the country, eviction proceedings are permitted. Diversion efforts such as mediation and rental assistance programs are two common responses local governments have implemented to mitigate the impact of a large increase in filings.

ODR in Miami-Dade

Miami-Dade County, Florida joins a small cohort of other jurisdictions, such as Delaware and Akron, Ohio, in piloting an eviction ODR program. The program utilizes Court Innovation’s Matterhorn platform to allow tenants and landlords to exchange messages and documents, set up a payment plan and explore other options to reach resolution. Parties can either negotiate directly or request the involvement of a mediator while using the platform.  

New Hampshire Expands Pre-Filing Programs

The New Hampshire Judicial Branch recently expanded upon its pre-filing diversion program statewide after promising results in pilot programs in two locations. This effort concentrates on resolving as many cases as possible before a court case is initiated, and either party can request a remote mediation session through the state Office of Mediation and Arbitration. Post-filing mediation is only available in a limited number of circuits, so parties are heavily encouraged to act before that stage is reached, especially in light of the fact that the pilot program boasted a 70% agreement and 91% satisfaction rate.

Keeping Up with Developments Nationwide

To stay up to date with the latest court eviction mediation developments, make sure you bookmark our National Program Database. And if you have any information for us that you see missing, please be sure to drop us a line!

Eviction Mediation Program Development in The Midst of Uncertainty

Eric Slepak Cherney, December 9th, 2021

This article is part of a series of perspectives on eviction mediation program development that is being supported by the American Arbitration Association-International Centre of Dispute Resolution Foundation. The AAA-ICDR’s grant is enabling RSI to expand our outreach to other court ADR colleagues working in the fast-evolving eviction field, and we are tremendously grateful to the Foundation for their support.
 

Over the past year and some change, RSI has been involved in developing three new eviction mediation efforts in northern Illinois. We have also had numerous conversations with court administrators and other court ADR practitioners across the country about how they were planning to deal with a possibly enormous spike in case volumes once eviction filings resumed. An underlying theme in all these efforts has been the tremendous level of uncertainty involved: When would this spike come? How big would it be? What could we do to mitigate its impact?

In the majority of jurisdictions, evictions can now be filed in most instances. But even where filings have resumed, the picture is not totally clear. For one, the prevalence of rental relief might be staving off some potential cases. While that is a great outcome, rental relief is not a permanent solution to maintaining affordable housing. The assistance can help renters and landlords get current and stave off eviction for a certain period of time, but many tenants are still faced with unemployment or underemployment that threatens to put them at risk for eviction again later. 

Advocates also noted that some defaulting renters chose to ‘self-evict’, leaving their homes without waiting for a judicial eviction order. Anecdotally, we have heard about some landlords intimidating their tenants into leaving. Similarly, some landlords and their lawyers complain about tenants not paying rent when they were able to do so during the moratoria. With regards to all of these phenomena, good data is not available, which leaves the view of the real eviction landscape quite unclear.

It is in this uncertain climate that we, and other court ADR professionals across the country, have been developing diversion programs. The closest analog we have had to rely upon in this program development phase was the mortgage foreclosure crisis over a decade ago. While the foreclosure mediation programs provided helpful guideposts about developing eviction mediation programs, those programs were developed in response to the foreclosure crisis, not in anticipation of it, as is the case with eviction mediation. In the previous crisis, we had quite a bit more reliable data. 

Of course, the upside here is that in this current situation, as these programs have mobilized much more rapidly in response to an expected crisis, they can hopefully mitigate far more of the damage. But as program developers and administrators, we have had to operate in the dark and make our best guesses in a lot of situations. 

For instance, without knowing the volume of cases, we have had to make lots of conjectures about hiring program staff, how many mediators we would need, how many mediation sessions we should schedule in a day, and for how long we should schedule each session. We have followed the introduction and renewal of the various moratoria, constantly revising our programmatic timetables. RSI, and many others, went through learning pains in developing programs that meet the needs of their local communities. Now, one program operates primarily online, but can also serve parties physically appearing in court, while others operate entirely online. We do all this in the midst of continuing uncertainty about whether court operations will remain online, go back to in-person, or follow a hybrid approach.

These examples are just some of the critical details that must be navigated when making a successful eviction mediation program. While the outcomes achieved at the mediation table (or mediation Zoom room) are ultimately the difference between a party being evicted or not, it is worth appreciating everything it takes to actually get the parties to the table. Throughout the pandemic, the obstacles to that have been great, and even now, there still remains a thick curtain of fog that we will continue navigating in order to do so.

Verified by ExactMetrics