Resources / Study / Innovation for Court ADR

Just Court ADR

The blog of Resolution Systems Institute

Archive for the ‘OPEN Project’ Category

What Can We Learn from One Short Quiz?

Jasmine Henry, September 15th, 2025

Do you know the best ways to communicate with self-represented litigants (SRLs)? That’s the question we asked our newsletter readers and social media followers over the last two months through a short (four-question) quiz. Our initial answer is in: Most quiz takers have some understanding of how best to share information with SRLs, but they also have the space to learn more.

Webinar 1: Enhancing Understanding While Reducing Stress
Wednesday, October 15, Noon-1 p.m. CT
Register for Webinar 1

Webinar 2: Creating Trust and Addressing the Tech Gap
Wednesday, November 12, Noon-1 p.m. CT
Register for Webinar 2

Our four questions — meant to be fun, engaging and educational — were based on the findings of our ODR Party Engagement (OPEN) Project. In prior research, RSI had observed the struggles SRLs can have navigating court processes, and we knew that court communications are not geared toward the 57% of the population that cannot read proficiently. So we set out to find out what SRLs need and want from court communications.  

With funding from the American Arbitration Association-International Centre for Dispute Resolution Foundation, we conducted focus groups across the U.S. to learn how to improve communications for SRLs. Using what we learned, we worked with an inclusive designer and an accessibility expert to create model communication materials. We conducted usability tests around the U.S. to get feedback on these new materials. Users gave our new Notice, website and video an average 4.8/5 rating for ease of understanding.

Now, we are committed to helping courts and other organizations better communicate with SRLs. Our quiz helps us achieve this goal by providing quiz takers with the best answers and explaining why they are the most effective options. If you would like to learn more about our findings, resources, guide and toolkit, check out the website we created (odr.aboutRSI.org) to share our knowledge with courts.

Before you continue with our article, we invite you to take our quiz and test your OPEN knowledge!

What the scores are and why they don’t matter.

As of the time of this writing, 33 people had responded to our quiz. Their average score was 42%. Though that’s a score that might feel demoralizing for some, we view it as an opportunity for quiz takers to gain essential knowledge about how to communicate with SRLs.

What we can learn from our hardest questions.

Two quiz questions stood out as particularly difficult, with less than half of the takers answering either question correctly. The questions focused on the best types of illustrations to use in documents and the best method for providing information on a webpage, respectively.

Best type of illustration to use

We asked quiz takers what type of illustration should accompany text about signing an agreement. We gave them four options, as seen in the table below. The response options included two photos and two illustrations. Despite photos making up half of the answer options, only 18% of quiz takers chose a photo as the best option. This suggests that court professionals might understand that photos are typically too complex to be used in instructive text. However, most quiz takers selected the complex illustration as the best option to accompany instructive text. Just over a quarter of quiz takers selected the correct answer: the simple illustration.

Any visuals used in communication materials for SRLs should highlight major concepts and draw the reader’s attention to them. They should not contain additional visual details that are not important to the core of your message, because excessive features can become distractions that pull your user’s focus from the relevant content.

Best method for providing information on a webpage

The question on webpage formatting got 32 responses. Quiz takers were asked if any of the following were good methods for providing information on a webpage. We gave them four options, as reflected in the table below, plus a “none of the above” option. While there was no majority agreement on this question, the largest segment of quiz takers indicated that it is a good idea to place many links on one page, and the smallest segment answered that it is best to fill both the left and right sides of the page with helpful information. A little under 20% of the quiz takers answered this question correctly, selecting “none of the above.”

While any of these answers might sound like a good tip, you will want to avoid all of them. Unfortunately, it is not helpful to provide a long list of links because that can lead to “link-surfing,” where users jump around on your webpage without actually reading and absorbing any information. It is also not recommended to have a user-entered search box because sometimes users do not know the terminology for the help they seek; or, if they do know the term, they may have difficulty spelling it accurately.

Moreover, filling the whole page with information can lead your user to feel overwhelmed; instead, it is best to create white space on your webpage and keep the most important information to one side of your screen. It is also important to remember that many users are approaching your webpage via their phone or a borrowed computer and may not have access to a PDF reader, digital storage device or free printer. Thus, it is important to embed all important information within the text of your webpage itself so it is easily accessed by all your users.

Want to learn more?

This fall, RSI will present two free webinars for courts, ADR professionals and others. In our series — From Confusion to Clarity: Court Communications that Work — we will offer insights into barriers to program communication and participation and how you can address those barriers. We will provide practicable “good” and “bad” examples and actionable tips on making court communications that your users will understand, trust and use.

So if you took our quiz and it left you wanting to learn more, click on the links to learn more and sign up for our webinars! Webinar 1: Enhancing Understanding While Reducing Stress takes place Wednesday, October 15 from Noon to 1 p.m. Central. Webinar 2: Creating Trust and Addressing the Tech Gap will be on Wednesday, November 12, from Noon to 1.pm. Central.

While participation is free, registration is required.

Tools Help Courts Explain ODR to the Public

Stephen Sullivan, May 12th, 2025

RSI has completed the second phase of the ODR Party Engagement (OPEN) Project! We are thrilled to share that our new communication tools to help courts educate self-represented litigants (SRLs) about ODR more effectively are now available. The tools can be accessed on our OPEN Project website.

The tools include RSI’s Model Notice to Defendant of Mandatory ODR, our Model ODR Explainer Video, and desktop and mobile website prototypes that contain our ODR Home Page, our Model ODR Self-Help Guide for Defendants, and our Model Account Registration Webpages.

Our Toolkit for Making ODR Make Sense to the Public provides step-by-step instructions for adapting our models or designing each model type based on our focus group and usability testing research.

OPEN Launch Party Recording
Learn all about RSI’s newest tools for improving court communications in this recording of our OPEN Launch Party webinar.

Designing New Court Communication Models

We partnered with an inclusive designer and an accessibility evaluator to ensure the models were easy to use and understand and accessible to individuals with disabilities. We structured the models around a simple workflow that provides a clear path for parties to follow to learn about and prepare for ODR. Importantly, we also scaffolded information about ODR across the models — we designed them to gradually introduce details about how ODR works, so parties do not feel overwhelmed.

To obtain feedback on the models from individuals similar to those most likely to use them, we conducted usability tests across the U.S. with a diverse set of participants whose backgrounds resembled those of SRLs with low literacy and low digital literacy. The final models reflect this collaborative approach among RSI, our design partner, an accessibility expert and 20 real users.

Usability Testing our Models

Overall, usability test participants found RSI’s OPEN Communication Models to be visually engaging, intuitive to navigate and, importantly, easy to read and understand. We asked participants to rate each of the models for how easy they were to understand; the final versions of the models received an average 4.8/5 rating.

Below are key findings from usability testing:

  • A mobile-first design is essential
    Overwhelmingly, our usability testers shared that they primarily access the internet using their smartphones. It is critical to create materials that are not just mobile-friendly but mobile-first in their design. This finding was further supported by participants’ enthusiasm for mobile-first features, such as the inclusion of a QR code on the Notice to simplify navigation to the website.
  • Testers’ confidence grew
    We found that as participants successfully navigated each model, their expressed confidence, understanding of ODR and sense of ease grew. Participants also demonstrated an interest in learning more about ODR, suggesting that our approach to scaffold information was effective at boosting participants’ engagement with the process.
  • Data privacy and security are top of mind
    Usability test participants responded very positively to our dedicated data privacy and confidentiality section on the model ODR Home Page. Providing concise and specific information about how ODR platforms address data privacy concerns can help alleviate users’ anxieties over these issues, even for those who are most hesitant about using the internet.
  • Simple materials enhance excitement for ODR
    Most of our usability test participants did not have any prior knowledge about ODR and were learning about it for the first time. After going through our materials, testers were not only able to accurately answer our questions about how ODR works, but also expressed their excitement for the prospect of ODR being available in their communities.

Recommendations to Courts

Feedback from our usability testers demonstrates that simple, easy-to-understand communication materials can positively impact parties’ understanding of and interest in ODR. Based on what we learned from usability testers and our work with an inclusive designer and an accessibility evaluator to design effective models, we developed a set of recommendations for courts to ensure that their communication materials can effectively be understood by SRLs. Check out our report, Designing a New Way to Communicate about ODR: Usability Testing Insights, to learn more about these recommendations and our usability test findings. 

Next Up: Support for Using Our Models

RSI is pleased to share that we have begun offering a technical assistance service to help courts and ADR organizations to enhance their communication materials about ADR programs. Contact us to learn more about the different ways we can help you communicate more effectively.

We are extremely grateful for the American Arbitration Association-International Centre for Dispute Resolution Foundation’s support for the OPEN Project and the dissemination of its findings.

Join RSI at an Online Demonstration of our New OPEN Project Communication Tools

Just Court ADR, March 11th, 2025

We’re rolling out RSI’s newest tools to support courts’ communication with parties, and you’re invited! Join us for an online demonstration, a Question & Answer session, and a chance to win a free one-hour consultation! Participation is free; registration is required.

What: RSI’s OPEN Project Model Tools Launch Party!
When: Thursday, April 3, 2025; 12 p.m. Central
Where: Zoom; please register here

Background:

You might have read about Phase 1 of our ODR Party Engagement (OPEN) Project. For Phase 2, RSI has developed model materials — a webpage, a notice document, an informational video and an interactive guide — to help courts communicate more effectively with self-represented litigants (SRLs) about online dispute resolution (ODR). We developed these models with the support of an inclusive designer and an accessibility expert, then user-tested them with a diverse set of individuals around the United States. Although focused on ODR, these materials offer innovative solutions to communicating with SRLs about any court program.

You can learn more about the OPEN Project, and download Communicating Effectively About ODR: A Guide for Courts and our Document Preparation Worksheet and Checklist, on the OPEN Project section of our website. You’ll also find updates on the project’s progress on our blog, Just Court ADR.

RSI is excited to share these new resources, and we hope to see you at the launch!

Shack Shares Insights from Research on ODR for Family Law Cases in NCTDR Webinar

Sandy Wiegand, December 18th, 2024

RSI Director of Research Jennifer Shack joined ODR.com CEO Colin Rule and Redek founder Nicolas Lozada this month for an ODR Cyberweek 2024 webinar on the topic of online dispute resolution to settle family law cases, focusing on a report Shack co-authored in 2021.

ODR Cyberweek is a free, virtual conference hosted annually by the National Center for Technology and Dispute Resolution (NCTDR).

Shack answered questions about the 2021 evaluation of a Michigan ODR program she conducted with University of California Davis law professor Donna Shestowsky, which was the first third-party evaluation of a family law ODR program in the United States.

The program, in Ottawa County, Michigan, was launched by the 20th Circuit of Michigan’s Friend of the Court in August 2020 with the goal of providing parties with post-judgment family law disputes a simpler, more convenient and cost-effective way to reach agreements related to child custody, parenting time and child support. It also aimed to increase efficiency in the disposition of these matters.

Among the topics that came up in the ODR Cyberweek discussion were the varying levels of interest by caseworkers and others in participating in ODR; the likelihood that cultural and demographic differences might impact openness to ODR, as well as ways of dealing with conflict in general; and the potential for and possible hurdles to using ODR to mediate cases where intimate partner violence is a factor.

Shack also offered insight on how to improve communications with parties about ODR as a means to improve understanding of the process and increase participation, based on findings from RSI’s ODR Party Engagement (OPEN) Project.

Lozada, who founded the Colombian ODR startup Redek, noted the challenges of advocating for ODR in Colombia when consistent internet access and use remains out of reach for much of the population. In addition to the access problems this presents, it can also mean that those who do have access remain wary of the legitimacy of online programs, Rule suggested. 

ODR.com recently launched a new AI-powered platform for ODR in family cases that integrates with court systems and provides tools to support mediators.

NCTDR’s ODR Cyberweek serves an international audience, is open to the public, and includes panels in English, Chinese, Spanish and Portuguese. Additional topics this year included AI integration in courts, mediation and arbitration, recent innovations and research findings. The event also included tech demos and a student panel. Recordings of many of the ODR Cyberweek sessions from this and previous years can be found in the NCTDR’s ODR Cyberweek Archive.

Verified by ExactMetrics